The Magic Bullet

[Jack Trojan]

A "blast-out" from the back could have pushed the head forward a couple of inches if there had been a "blast-out" from the back. There wasn't.

According to over a dozen Parkland medical professionals who were there, there was a blast-out from the back. Why should I believe you?

[Tim Nickerson]

According to over a dozen Parkland medical professionals who were there, there was a blast-out from the back. Why should I believe you?

Name the over a dozen Parkland medical professionals who maintained that there was a blast-out from the back.

You don't have to believe me . The Zapruder film, the autopsy photos and x-rays, and the autopsy report speak for themselves.

[Bill Chapman]

It's McAdams, and don't.  Not unless you want more of the same rhetoric you get here from LNers.

As opposed to your endless proclamations of what witnesses saw or meant. To wit: Are you certain Brennan wasn't still concerned, even after finding out that Euins was a second witness?

And is it within the realm of possibilty that he would hold back from telling his wife (according to you) so as to not upset her unnecessarily?

Hoffman changed his story over time and even his brothers (and/or father) said he had a habit of telling tall stories.

And do you mean the Jean Hill who saw a small dog in the limo? Great eyesight there, huh. You forgot to mention that this lady in red told a TV station back then that she didn't see a shooter, only heard the shot. Then in 1992, said she saw the shooter firing from behind a tree.

Is that your definition of rhetoric?

Go ask Alice.

 

[Martin Weidmann]

As opposed to your endless proclamations of what witnesses saw or meant. To wit: Are you certain Brennan wasn't still concerned, even after finding out that Euins was a second witness?

And is it within the realm of possibilty that he would hold back from telling his wife (according to you) so as to not upset her unnecessarily?

Hoffman changed his story over time and even his brothers (and/or father) said he had a habit of telling tall stories.

And do you mean the Jean Hill who saw a small dog in the limo? Great eyesight there, huh. You forgot to mention that this lady in red told a TV station back then that she didn't see a shooter, only heard the shot. Then in 1992, said she saw the shooter firing from behind a tree.

Is that your definition of rhetoric?

Go ask Alice.

 

Hoffman changed his story over time

So did Brennan! Kinda destroys the point you foolishly tried to make.

[Bill Chapman]

Hoffman changed his story over time

So did Brennan! Kinda destroys the point you foolishly tried to make.

Brennan's story remains consistent with his stated fear for the safety of his family. Show us third-party confirmation of any persons who knew Brennan (relatives, friends) as anything but truthful.

On the contrary, even Hoffman's own kin said he had a propensity for telling tall tales, FFS.

[Martin Weidmann]

Brennan's story is consistent with his stated fear for the safety of his family. Show us third-party confirmation of any persons who knew Brennan (relatives, friends) as anything but truthful.

Even Hoffman's own kin said he had a propensity for telling tall tales, FFS.

Brennan's story is consistent

Read his book and compare it to his initial statements.... maybe you learn something.

[Bill Chapman]

Brennan's story is consistent

Read his book and compare it to his initial statements.... maybe you learn something.

Do you mean the book ghost-written some 42 years after the fact? And here I thought you characters (Oswald apologists) were such champions of first-day (even first-minute, it seems) information

Why not pull out a statement of two from his book and show us how the basic conclusion changes what he swore to in his affidavit and WC testimony? Or are you taking what he said and deciding for yourself what he actually meant?

[John Iacoletti]

It had to have been the third shot. A fragment strike from the second shot is just not plausible at all.

Why?  Just because you believe that CE399 was the second shot?