The Magic Bullet

[Michael Chambers]

Quote from: John Iacoletti on June 06, 2018, 02:22:32 AM
Which back wound?  The one at the T-3, the one at T-1, or the one at C-7?

C7. I only accept it as any back wounds but each to their own. 

My mistake I had not realised this wound is not/might not be C7. This one with the hands and ruler anyway. 

[Gary Craig]

??The yellow arrow shows the straight line path of a bullet on a downward 17 degree angle that exits in the same location that the bullet that passed through JFK exited.

So you're trying to show the path of the bullet through JFK's neck based on the Ford's edited entrance

point?

You do know the top of the right lung was bruised? That would have to have been caused by a shock wave

created by the bullet as it went through JFK's neck, no?

If the bullet created that type of shock wave, how does it exit the front of the neck through a neat, clean

cut, 3mm hole?  Such a shock wave would have blasted the front of his throat out.

[Mike Orr]

When Dr. Perry made the Tracheostomy cut in the frontal entry neck wound he made an incision that was short and neat and as Dr. McClelland said "Perry was a master with the scalpel" .
The wound described by Dr. Perry as round 5 mm and roughly to spherical to oval shape , not a punched out wound like is seen at Bethesda , went back to looking like it did before the small incision that was made by Dr. Perry . The garbled up look of the front of JFK's neck was not done at Parkland as per Parkland ! Like Thomas Robinson said " talking of surgery to the head " to make it look like the wounds on JFK had come from shots from the rear " The Drs. did that "!


               www.manuscriptservice.com/Throat-Wound/

[Gary Craig]

When Dr. Perry made the Tracheostomy cut in the frontal entry neck wound he made an incision that was short and neat and as Dr. McClelland said "Perry was a master with the scalpel" .
The wound described by Dr. Perry as round 5 mm and roughly to spherical to oval shape , not a punched out wound like is seen at Bethesda , went back to looking like it did before the small incision that was made by Dr. Perry . The garbled up look of the front of JFK's neck was not done at Parkland as per Parkland ! Like Thomas Robinson said " talking of surgery to the head " to make it look like the wounds on JFK had come from shots from the rear " The Drs. did that "!


               www.manuscriptservice.com/Throat-Wound/

Interesting.

At Parkland it appears to be a clean neat 3mm entrance wound.

At Bethesda it has the appearance of being blasted out from a shot from the rear.

[Jack Trojan]

I'm still waiting for you to use this simple/cheap experiment to invalidate the SBT. Why haven't you done so? After all, it's cheap, simple on spot-on accurate, right? So, why haven't you done it yet?

Because you can't prove a negative. Try to keep up.

[Mike Orr]

Jack , I think we are fighting a battle of futility ! How can you have a magic bullet when the bullet does not traverse the body . Hell , we know the shot in the neck was from the front. We know he got shot in the back from the rear , but not where Ford placed the wound at the base of the neck . Do you think Ford was pushed to move the placement of the wound by someone other than the those men who LBJ picked to be on the Warren Commission ? It was suggested that Ford was a mole who told Hoover and LBJ how the Commission was leaning on certain items that were being discussed . I think the shots from the front were a last resort for those involved in the shooting because there had not been a fatal ( Kill shot ) until the last shot in JFK's right temple that blew the back of his head off. If I'm not mistaken I think Drs. can tell the difference between cerebellum and cerebrum. Cerrebellum was dropping out of the back of JFK's head . The Parkland Drs. have been made to look like a bunch of Drs. who could not tell where the wounds were located or from which direction the bullets came from. As Jim Marrs said when asked if we would ever know what really happened on Nov. 22 , 1963 . We already know !

[Jerry Freeman]

NO NEED FOR LASERS OR 'MODIFIED' X-RAY PHOTOS

Correct.....however-
One does need to actually fire a bullet, using a 1940 piece of crap rifle [from a distance of 150 feet is OK]..have it traverse 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of muscle tissue, strike a necktie knot, remove 4 inches of rib, and shatter a radius bone and have it come out looking brand new.
 Let us know how well you do.

[Howard Gee]

Correct.....however-
One does need to actually fire a bullet, using a 1940 piece of crap rifle [from a distance of 150 feet is OK]..have it traverse 15 layers of clothing, 7 layers of skin, and approximately 15 inches of muscle tissue, strike a necktie knot, remove 4 inches of rib, and shatter a radius bone and have it come out looking brand new.
 Let us know how well you do.

I see we're making some progress.

Jerry seems to be conceding that the trajectory of the SBT isn't impossible.

That's a start.

Naturally, once the droolers are shown that the trajectory of the SBT isn't impossible, the next step is to show that a bullet could cause the wounds and emerge relatively intact.

Jerry knows that 399 didn't 'come out looking brand new', so we'll let that go.

Rather, we will demonstrate that a single bullet could indeed cause all the wounds and emerge relatively intact. That is to say, not fragmented, nose not smashed, and not tremendously mangled as the detractors of the SBT insist would have to be the case.

I submit that the documentary 'Beyond The Magic Bullet' does just that.

If anyone can provide a better re-enactment of the SBT, I'd love to see it.

Impossible trajectory ?  Objection overruled.

Impossible to cause the wounds and not be mangled ?  Objection overruled.

The Court finds that the SBT is not only possible, it's the best explanation available !

Judge Gee has ruled.

Next case, please.