Should I take this as a concession that you agree a frontal throat entry didn't happen ?
No, but I'll take that as a concession that you don't understand basic logic or the written English language.
Of course you never claimed a bullet entered JFK's throat.
You don't have the stones to state what you think happened.
Never have, never will.
It doesn't take "stones" to make up a conclusion and then insist that it's right unless someone else can prove you wrong, while insulting them with childish remarks. What that takes is arrogance and cowardice.
Still trying to figure out the difference between "not recovered" and "disappeared"?
If a bullet entered JFK's throat , it was just "not recovered". By Coward the Troll's own standards, that is a sufficient "explanation".