More Fake Pictures of Oswald

[John Iacoletti]

These are is images that the Apple face id sees, all these little dots are used to create a depth map of someone's face and since our faces are all unique this form of identification is virtually infallible.

This is all very interesting and technical sounding, and it has ZERO to do with your contrived morphs and the sweeping generalizations you make from them.

[John Iacoletti]

Careful or John may resort to using his "strawman" rebuttal or the devastating "LOL" as in "Oswald's rifle - LOL."

Calling it "Oswald's rifle" doesn't actually demonstrate that it was Oswald's rifle.

I know you wish it did.

[Jerry Freeman]

 
Btw what on Earth is "infliable"?

It just doesn't fli



 
 

[John Mytton]

"Expert" said it, "Mytton" believes it, and that settles it.

No, Experts say it and JohnM supplies practical examples to prove it.



JohnM

[John Mytton]

This is all very interesting and technical sounding...

 



JohnM

[John Mytton]

Calling it "Oswald's rifle" doesn't actually demonstrate that it was Oswald's rifle.

LOL!



JohnM

[Jack Trojan]

No, Experts say it and JohnM supplies practical examples to prove it.

JohnM

Mytton you are such a joke. Your morphs do NOT track facial features, otherwise, explain how the algorithms work smart guy.  Morphs are a fade that use edge detection and high pass filters to smooth the transition between frames. But rest assured that every intermediary frame is BULLSHlT and useless for analysis! But you are just a wannabe photo-analyst that found the Morph button on your GIMP app. Otherwise, you know squat about how any of this works.  So STFU because you are out of your league and a disservice to the JFK Forum.

[Jack Trojan]

Your gif is not taking into account the wide-angle effect. In the original prints CE-133A and CE133B we see that Oswald was in differing parts of the frame and subsequently was affected by the predictable lens distortion.

My gif is as described. I don't dick around with my images like you do.

In the following gif I applied approximately the same lens correction to CE-133b as seen in CE133a.

You applied a lens correction? Please explain. This should be good.

Even though there is a number of parallax changes between CE 133A and CE133B the following comparison shows the stairs and the fence and etc to be almost aligned.

Parallax indicates a change in camera position. Is that what you are claiming?

Now when we take into account the wide angle effect and the differing positions of Oswald and Marina we see that Oswald's head when in the same position of the frame becomes the same shape and he is the same size.

 

Btw are you sure that there is different lens distortions in the backyard photos?

Yes, I am sure. Take a course in this stuff for god's sake so I won't laugh at your naive posts. Still waiting for some photogrammetry from you to back up your BS.

JackT