Did Oswald really beat his wife?

[Bill Chapman]

Where's Mark Ulrick to accuse you of not giving credit to your source? Oh, I guess he only does this to CTers.

Like you do to LNers...
To wit: Where's your criticism of Sorenson, who used the Alexander Kleinlerer affidavit as did I.

Show us where he provided a link to his source:
(Sorenson) Reply #90 on: July 14, 2018, 07:53:46 PM ?

By the way, Are you too lame to know how to quickly track down an unattributed article? I tracked Sorenson's within 5 seconds...

[Bill Chapman]

A classic JM diversion?. Or perhaps it's more an obsession. Nobody cares about how many times a person posts, except of course little Johnny....

One wonders what he hopes to gain by bringing this crap up time after time.

No one cares how many times someone posts except the ones paid per post 

[Jerry Freeman]

I wonder who really cares what little Johnny thinks

He does? Or he does....whichever

[John Iacoletti]

The facts are all there John, selfish Oswald had a stack of money yet kept the vast majority for himself until that is the day he decided to kill the President.
And Oswald leaving his wedding ring in Marina's family tea cup was just another coincidence, eh John?

Sorry, I dozed off for a minute there.  Is this supposed to be evidence of murder?

[John Iacoletti]

Marina testified that Oswald rarely if ever left his wedding ring at home but on the day of the assassination tightarse Oswald left virtually all his money and left his Wedding Ring in one of Marina's family heirlooms.
The explanation that this was all premeditated and he knew that this day was his last one with Marina is a sensible conclusion unless of course you can suggest something equally logical?

And by "sensible conclusion", you mean completely unsubstantiated make-believe.

[John Iacoletti]

You can't even get this right, Oswald left the money for his children, he did say Junie needed new shoes which was obviously an allegory to get them everything they wanted because Daddy is going to do something real stupid.

It's an allegory for "Mytton's been hallucinating again".

[John Iacoletti]

Are you too lame to know how to quickly track down an unattributed article?

No, you are too dishonest to credit your cut-and-paste jobs as not your own work.  That's how I know you're a plagiarist, because I did track it down.

And instead of addressing the content of what I posted, you dodge and veer off to nitpick about attribution... all the while giving Tom Sorenson a free pass for his 'cut-and-paste' and his non-attributed post* from the exact same source as mine. Oh, wait... he's a CTer

Lame.  You're no better than Trump.  Deflect, deflect, deflect.

[Martin Weidmann]

 

You keep replying to me, so that's one.



JohnM

Desperate for an ego boost, are you?